[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F2F78E.8050002@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:07:42 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] ARM: dts: dragonboard-600c: add board support with
serial
On 03/23/2016 12:47 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e96aab6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-dragonboard-600c.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +#include "qcom-apq8064-v2.0.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ8064 DragonBoard600c";
> + compatible = "qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c", "qcom,apq8064";
Does the bootloader look at this string at all or is it using appended
DTB design? I'm mostly worried about having that
qcom,apq8064-dragonboard600c part. It should probably be
qcom,apq8064-sbc or something like that instead.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists