linux-kernel - Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Staging: lustre: o2iblnd: Use sizeof type *pointer instead of sizeof type."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160323204339.GA21923@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:43:39 -0400
From:	'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>
Cc:	'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>,
	"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Staging: lustre: o2iblnd: Use
 sizeof type *pointer instead of sizeof type."

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:29:49PM +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> 
> >> > > so the right code should be:
> >> > > 
> >> > >         sizeof(**net->ibn_tx_ps);
> >> > > and the same for sizeof(**net->ibn_fmr_ps)
> >> > That's a mess, isn't there some other way to fix this up to be more
> >> > "obvious"?
> >> This must have been encountered in the past. How was it handle in those
> >> other cases?
> >
> >I fail to see why it's a mess.  It's just **
> >and someone making a mistake.
> 
> I have no trouble with **.  If we revert it someone else will come along and
> do the same mistake so I think we are stuck with the change to **.

That's fine, but if you do that, just comment it well so that no one
tries to change it again.  That's why I can't accept the original patch
in this email thread.

thanks,

greg k-h