linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/17] watchdog: qcom: configure BARK time in addition to BITE time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160323224226.GD18567@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:42:26 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	andy.gross@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	qca-upstream.external@....qualcomm.com,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] watchdog: qcom: configure BARK time in addition to
 BITE time

On 03/23, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> For certain parts and some versions of TZ, TZ will reset the chip
> when a BARK is triggered even though it was not configured here. So
> by default let's configure this BARK time as well.
> 

Why isn't TZ configuring the bark time to what it wants? I'm lost
why we have to do this for them.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project