[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160323170415.65ecf521@t450s.home>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:04:15 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc: treding@...dia.com, joro@...tes.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V2 2/2] iommu: remove sysfs_link to device in
iommu_group/devices when failed
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:25:11 +0000
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
> The original code forgets to remove the sysfs_link to a device in
> iommu_group/devices directory, when the creation fails or conflicts on the
> name.
>
> This patch tries to remove the sysfs_link on the failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 2696a38..8f480ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ rename:
> ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(group->devices_kobj,
> &dev->kobj, device->name);
> if (ret) {
> + sysfs_remove_link(group->devices_kobj, device->name);
> kfree(device->name);
> if (ret == -EEXIST && i >= 0) {
> /*
If we failed to create a link, potentially due to a conflicting link
already present, then aren't we arbitrarily removing that conflicting
link with this change? If sysfs_create_link_nowarn() fails then we
haven't created a link of our own to remove. This looks wrong. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists