linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/7] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use the new virt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1458780837-4367-4-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:53:54 -0700
From:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
	vkuznets@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use the new virt_xx barrier code

Use the virt_xx barriers that have been defined for use in virtual machines.

Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
---
 drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
index 67dc245..c2c2b2e 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
@@ -33,14 +33,14 @@
 void hv_begin_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
 {
 	rbi->ring_buffer->interrupt_mask = 1;
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 }
 
 u32 hv_end_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
 {
 
 	rbi->ring_buffer->interrupt_mask = 0;
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 
 	/*
 	 * Now check to see if the ring buffer is still empty.
@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ u32 hv_end_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
 
 static bool hv_need_to_signal(u32 old_write, struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
 {
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 	if (READ_ONCE(rbi->ring_buffer->interrupt_mask))
 		return false;
 
 	/* check interrupt_mask before read_index */
-	rmb();
+	virt_rmb();
 	/*
 	 * This is the only case we need to signal when the
 	 * ring transitions from being empty to non-empty.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static bool hv_need_to_signal_on_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *rbi)
 	u32 cur_write_sz;
 	u32 pending_sz;
 
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 	pending_sz = READ_ONCE(rbi->ring_buffer->pending_send_sz);
 	/* If the other end is not blocked on write don't bother. */
 	if (pending_sz == 0)
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ int hv_ringbuffer_write(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *outring_info,
 					     sizeof(u64));
 
 	/* Issue a full memory barrier before updating the write index */
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 
 	/* Now, update the write location */
 	hv_set_next_write_location(outring_info, next_write_location);
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ int hv_ringbuffer_read(struct hv_ring_buffer_info *inring_info,
 	 * the writer may start writing to the read area once the read index
 	 * is updated.
 	 */
-	mb();
+	virt_mb();
 
 	/* Update the read index */
 	hv_set_next_read_location(inring_info, next_read_location);
-- 
1.7.4.1