linux-kernel - Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Staging: lustre: o2iblnd: Use sizeof type *pointer instead of sizeof type."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D317846B.138487%andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 05:39:36 +0000
From:	"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
CC:	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] Revert "Staging: lustre: o2iblnd: Use
 sizeof type *pointer instead of sizeof type."

On 2016/03/22, 19:49, "lustre-devel on behalf of Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<lustre-devel-bounces@...ts.lustre.org on behalf of
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0400, James Simmons wrote:
>> Latest testing fails when using ko2iblnd. It was tracked down
>> to commit 4671a026616df26000f7d8ad2f2ea4b6de79263c.
>> 
>> This reverts commit 4671a026616df26000f7d8ad2f2ea4b6de79263c.
>> ---
>>  .../staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c    |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c
>>b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c
>> index 89f9390..0d32e65 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c
>> @@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ static int kiblnd_net_init_pools(kib_net_t *net,
>>__u32 *cpts, int ncpts)
>>  	 */
>>  
>>  	net->ibn_fmr_ps = cfs_percpt_alloc(lnet_cpt_table(),
>> -					   sizeof(*net->ibn_fmr_ps));
>> +					   sizeof(kib_fmr_poolset_t));
>
>Ok, why is this revert needed?  Please give me a big huge comment about
>why this is not the same size of the variable being assigned to it,
>otherwise someone else is going to come along and make the exact same
>change again.
>
>>  	if (!net->ibn_fmr_ps) {
>>  		CERROR("Failed to allocate FMR pool array\n");
>>  		rc = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ static int kiblnd_net_init_pools(kib_net_t *net,
>>__u32 *cpts, int ncpts)
>>  
>>   create_tx_pool:
>>  	net->ibn_tx_ps = cfs_percpt_alloc(lnet_cpt_table(),
>> -					  sizeof(*net->ibn_tx_ps));
>> +					  sizeof(kib_tx_poolset_t));
>
>Same here, why is this code wrong?

Looks like the declarations are:

        kib_tx_poolset_t	**ibn_tx_ps;	/* tx pool-set */
	kib_fmr_poolset_t	**ibn_fmr_ps;	/* fmr pool-set */



so the right code should be:

        sizeof(**net->ibn_tx_ps);


and the same for sizeof(**net->ibn_fmr_ps)

Cheers, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Dilger

Lustre Principal Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division