[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458796269-6158-3-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:11:09 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit more efficient
Currently, we check cpuidle_ops.suspend every time when entering a
low-power idle state. But this check could be avoided in this hot path
by moving it into arm_cpuidle_init() to reduce arm_cpuidle_suspend()
overhead a bit.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
index f108d8f..bf68d49 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
@@ -52,13 +52,9 @@ int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
*/
int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
{
- int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
- ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
-
- return ret;
+ return cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
}
/**
@@ -144,7 +140,7 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
if (!ret) {
- if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
+ if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].init && cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
else
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.8.0.rc3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists