linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 4/6] rt/locking: Reenable migration accross schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1603241140510.3978@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:44:13 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/6] rt/locking: Reenable migration accross schedule

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 09:43 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 00:02 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > 
> > > We currently disable migration across lock acquisition. That includes the part
> > > where we block on the lock and schedule out. We cannot disable migration after
> > > taking the lock as that would cause a possible lock inversion.
> > > 
> > > But we can be smart and enable migration when we block and schedule out. That
> > > allows the scheduler to place the task freely at least if this is the first
> > > migrate disable level. For nested locking this does not help at all.
> > 
> > I met a problem while testing shiny new hotplug machinery.
> > 
> > rt/locking: Fix rt_spin_lock_slowlock() vs hotplug migrate_disable() bug
> > 
> > migrate_disable() -> pin_current_cpu() -> hotplug_lock() leads to..
> > 	> BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on));
> > ..so let's call migrate_disable() after we acquire the lock instead.
> 
> Well crap, that wasn't very clever  A little voice kept nagging me, and
> yesterday I realized what it was grumbling about, namely that doing
> migrate_disable() after lock acquisition will resurrect a hotplug
> deadlock that we fixed up a while back.

Glad you found out yourself. Telling you that was on my todo list ....
 
> On the bright side, with the busted migrate enable business reverted,
> plus one dinky change from me [1], master-rt.today has completed 100
> iterations of Steven's hotplug stress script along side endless
> futexstress, and is happily doing another 900 as I write this, so the
> next -rt should finally be hotplug deadlock free.
> 
> Thomas's state machinery seems to work wonders.  'course this being
> hotplug, the other shoe will likely apply itself to my backside soon.

That's a given :)

I really wonder what makes the change. The only thing which comes to my mind
is the enforcement of running the online and down_prepare callbacks on the
plugged cpu instead of doing it wherever the scheduler decides to run it.
 
> 1. nest module_mutex inside hotplug_lock to prevent bloody systemd
> -udevd from blocking in migrate_disable() while holding kernfs_mutex
> during module load, putting a quick end to hotplug stress testing.
 
Did I miss a patch here or is that still in your pile?

Thanks,

	tglx