linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:07:55 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX
 XSAVE features



On 24/03/2016 14:06, Yang Zhang wrote:
> 
> I mean why not keep the old way that only activate the eager_fpu while
> guest sees the MPX bit in CPUID, like:
> 
> vcpu->arch.eager_fpu = use_eager_fpu() && guest_cpuid_has_mpx(vcpu);

If the host uses eager FPU you can assume that it's faster than lazy FPU.

Paolo

> Besides, vmx_fpu_activate is called when do vcpu_reset. So it seems no
> need to call fpu_activate() here again.