[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160324132127.GA8452@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:21:27 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop 'base' from struct tpm_vendor_specific
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:45:42AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:16:09AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Dropped the field 'base' from struct tpm_vendor_specific and migrated
> > it to the private structures of tpm_atmel and tpm_nsc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> > +#define atmel_get_priv(chip) ((struct tpm_atmel_priv *) chip->vendor.priv)
>
> This should be a static inline function not a define
>
> > +#define tpm_nsc_get_priv(chip) ((struct tpm_nsc_priv *) chip->vendor.priv)
>
> Ditto
>
> Otherwise looks ok
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Thank you. In my the commit now in my master branch they are now changed
as static inline functions.
> Jason
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists