linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop 'base' from struct tpm_vendor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:21:27 +0200
From:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
	<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop 'base' from struct tpm_vendor_specific

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:45:42AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:16:09AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Dropped the field 'base' from struct tpm_vendor_specific and migrated
> > it to the private structures of tpm_atmel and tpm_nsc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>   
> > +#define atmel_get_priv(chip) ((struct tpm_atmel_priv *) chip->vendor.priv)
> 
> This should be a static inline function not a define
> 
> > +#define tpm_nsc_get_priv(chip) ((struct tpm_nsc_priv *) chip->vendor.priv)
> 
> Ditto
> 
> Otherwise looks ok
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>

Thank you. In my the commit now in my master branch they are now changed
as static inline functions.

> Jason

/Jarkko