linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: marvell: Clean up armada-7040-db

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160324135931.GE26573@io.lakedaemon.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:59:31 +0000
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: marvell: Clean up armada-7040-db

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I agree that converting the Marvell Armada 32-bits SoCs would produce a
> > > lot of churn. But if some binding are common there is no file at all are
> > > in common, so we could use this solution for the 64 bits SoCs only.
> > 
> > Yes, we could. I'm fine with it. I was merely pointing out that it is
> > moving away from our 32 bits way of doing things.
> 
> Sebastian spent a while converting dove and kirkwood to this
> scheme. Most boards have i2c, nand, eth, and mdio properties
> represented link this.
> 
> There are no many 64 bit boards, so now is the time to make the
> change...

Agreed.

thx,

Jason.