linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/23] ARM: dts: n950: add display support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87io0b52ss.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:11:15 +0200
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] ARM: dts: n950: add display support

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> As I said: I did use 864 initially. That results in missing pixels.

Sorry, I didn't mean to question this. Go with what works, not with some
old fart's ramblings!

> I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the
> last few pixels of the 864 display with plastic. So technically
> it's a 864 display, but effectively it's 854.

(*shudder* at "your HW team" ;)

It's plausible, the covers did change slightly for the developer
edition.

Good luck with the upstreaming efforts!


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center