[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458849121-11242-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:52:01 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"
This reverts commit 909f7ee0b5f30f735e16864a7ed18d2e6123e6d9.
Apparently due to a wrongly resolved merge conflict between two
branches, which contained the same commit, the commit contents
partially was added two times in a row.
This change reverts the latter wrong inclusion of commit 909f7ee0b5f3
("regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration").
The first applied commit 670666b9e0af ("regulator: core: Add support
for active-discharge configuration") is not touched.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index e0b7642..1cff112 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1150,17 +1150,6 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
}
}
- if (rdev->constraints->active_discharge && ops->set_active_discharge) {
- bool ad_state = (rdev->constraints->active_discharge ==
- REGULATOR_ACTIVE_DISCHARGE_ENABLE) ? true : false;
-
- ret = ops->set_active_discharge(rdev, ad_state);
- if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set active discharge\n");
- return ret;
- }
- }
-
print_constraints(rdev);
return 0;
}
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists