[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F52502.3060308@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:46:10 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, linux@....linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: fix !cpuidle_ops[cpu].init case during
init
On 03/24/2016 06:11 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Let's assume cpuidle_ops exists but it doesn't implement the according
> init member, current arm_cpuidle_init() will return success to its
> caller, but in fact it should return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 703926e..f108d8f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -143,8 +143,12 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
> - if (!ret && cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
> - ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
> + ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
> + else
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
Hi Jisheng,
this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists