[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F54208.7020907@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:50:00 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: fix permission_fault()
On 25/03/2016 14:41, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>
>>
>> So is this patch doing the same as "KVM: MMU: precompute page fault
>> error code"? It was necessary after all. :)
>
> Sorry for my mistake... I missed the logic you changed :(
>
> I still prefer to calculating the error code on the fault path which is
> rare, or think a way to encapsulate it to permission_fault()...
Yes, I will apply your patch.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists