[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160325150259.GA9372@earth>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:02:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>, tony@...mide.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl: Enable regulators over the powerbus as
well
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:17:57AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:22:36PM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
> > Assigning a device group to a regulator does not change its state. To
> > change the state of a regulator a message over the powerbus is required.
> > Also, the check for the current state of a regulator should not count on
> > a device group being assigned, but on the current resource state.
>
> How did this driver ever work then? It sounds like there must be
> something else going on here.
From my understanding of the twl4030 TRM assigning a device group
means "<device group> wants this regulator enabled". It does not
change the regulator mode (sleep vs normal or in regulator-framework
terms: REGULATOR_STATUS_NORMAL vs REGULATOR_STATUS_STANDBY).
It usually works, since the default state is normal. If the system
is rebooted from a non-mainline kernel, which left the regulator in
sleep/standby, nothing in the kernel switches it to normal.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists