[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160325.112438.1680393079835321066.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, aduyck@...antis.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netpoll: Fix extra refcount release in
netpoll_cleanup()
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:56:21 -0500
> netpoll_setup() does a dev_hold() on np->dev, the netpoll device. If it
> fails, it correctly does a dev_put() but leaves np->dev set. If we call
> netpoll_cleanup() after the failure, np->dev is still set so we do another
> dev_put(), which decrements the refcount an extra time.
>
> It's questionable to call netpoll_cleanup() after netpoll_setup() fails,
> but it can be difficult to find the problem, and we can easily avoid it in
> this case. The extra decrements can lead to hangs like this:
>
> unregister_netdevice: waiting for bond0 to become free. Usage count = -3
>
> Set and clear np->dev at the points where we dev_hold() and dev_put() the
> device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Looks good, applied and queued up for -stable.
But you probably do want to look into the stacked device issue
Neil pointed out.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists