linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: dgnc: fix 'line over 80 characters'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHb8M2BSuqmLw_4aOfEMhqckGczpF0ySmOrE9AhCq_18OqQCDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:42:44 +0900
From:	DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@...il.com>,
	Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org" 
	<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: dgnc: fix 'line over 80 characters'

2016-03-25 12:19 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 11:44 +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> fix checkpatch.pl warning about 'line over 80 characters'
>> in dgnc_neo.c
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> []
>> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ struct board_ops dgnc_neo_ops = {
>>       .send_immediate_char =          neo_send_immediate_char
>>  };
>>
>> -static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
>> +static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08,
>> +                                  0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
>
Hi, Joe.

> It may be better to remove this array and use BIT or << where
> dgnc_offset_table is used instead.
Yes, I will remove this array, and use BIT or '<<' instead of using table.
But "a patch" as to have one meaning so I think this patch will be
sent with another one.
>
> If not, this should be const.
>
> static const uint dgnc_offset_table[] = {
>         0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80
> };
>
>> @@ -116,7 +117,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
>>       writeb(efr, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
>>
>>       /* Turn on table D, with 8 char hi/low watermarks */
>> -     writeb((UART_17158_FCTR_TRGD | UART_17158_FCTR_RTS_4DELAY), &ch->ch_neo_uart->fctr);
>> +     writeb((UART_17158_FCTR_TRGD | UART_17158_FCTR_RTS_4DELAY),
>> +             &ch->ch_neo_uart->fctr);
>
> You could remove parentheses here around the CONST | CONST
OK. I got it. but it also, I will send a patch after fixing this, not
in this, right?
>
>> @@ -150,7 +152,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_rts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
>>       /* Turn on UART enhanced bits */
>>       writeb(efr, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
>>
>> -     writeb((UART_17158_FCTR_TRGD | UART_17158_FCTR_RTS_4DELAY), &ch->ch_neo_uart->fctr);
>> +     writeb((UART_17158_FCTR_TRGD | UART_17158_FCTR_RTS_4DELAY),
>> +             &ch->ch_neo_uart->fctr);
>
> and here and all the other writeb uses
Thanks.

regards,
Daeseok.
>