| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160326124844.417c23a5@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:48:44 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> To: Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@...il.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v4.6] MDB Linux Kernel Debugger x86/x86_64 Hi Jeff, On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:01:27 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@...il.com> wrote: > > I went back and checked the code and as it turns out, none of the > patches you nak'd are in the current branch, there are different > patches there now. There are two patches you ignored that are in it, > but no record of a Nak for either of them. OK, so one obvious problem is that the tree you want merged has a single patch in it and the diffstat looks like this: Documentation/sysrq.txt | 2 +- MAINTAINERS | 6 + arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h | 9 +- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/Makefile | 3 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/Makefile | 6 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/Makefile.local | 106 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-base.c | 3293 +++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-base.h | 447 ++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia-apic.c | 243 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia-proc.h | 819 ++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia-support.c | 5342 +++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia-support.h | 76 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia.c | 6887 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-ia.h | 209 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-keyboard.h | 127 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-list.c | 534 +++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-list.h | 96 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-logic.c | 2118 +++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-main.c | 786 ++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-os.c | 1474 ++++++ arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-os.h | 141 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb-proc.h | 179 + arch/x86/kernel/debug/mdb/mdb.h | 40 + arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 6 +- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 18 + arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 69 +- arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 14 + drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 4 + include/asm-generic/bug.h | 4 + include/linux/console.h | 4 + kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_debugger.c | 2 +- kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 + kernel/extable.c | 1 + kernel/kallsyms.c | 45 + kernel/module.c | 43 + kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 + kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 1 + kernel/watchdog.c | 17 +- lib/Kconfig.debug | 66 + 44 files changed, 23240 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Having it in that form makes it pretty hard for anyone to review ... If you have a set if incremental patches, maybe you should post those instead. I am afraid that if the maintainers affected by this code will not merge it, I cannot justify putting it in linux-next myself. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists