[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160327204413.GB9638@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:44:13 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc: ebiggers3@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Bloat caused by unnecessary calls to compound_head()?
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 04:33:04PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Could you just mark compound_head __pure? That would tell the compiler
> that it's safe to re-use the return value as long as there is no memory
> mutation in between.
>
Hm. It has some positive impact, but it's not dramatic. For instance,
mm/swap.o results:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-43 (-43)
function old new delta
__page_cache_release 319 298 -21
release_pages 722 700 -22
mark_page_accessed() problem was not fixed by that.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists