linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:09:43 +0200
From:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	khilman@...libre.com, xf@...k-chips.com, wxt@...k-chips.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
	zyw@...k-chips.com, xxx@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests

Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2016, 05:22:54 schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> On some Rockchip SoC there exist child-domains only handling their
> idle state with the actual power-state handled by a parent-domain.
> 
> So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their
> state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead.
> 
> There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling
> were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the
> code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them
> 
> So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their
> state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead.
> 
> There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling
> were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the
> code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them
> in a correct, without adding more checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>

applied to my armsoc/drivers branch for 4.7


Thanks
Heiko