lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F9248D.70100@collabora.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:33:17 -0300
From:	Emilio López <emilio.lopez@...labora.co.uk>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>,
	Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] selftest: sync: disable tests that rely on not
 yet defined behaviour

El 09/03/16 a las 13:14, Shuah Khan escribió:
> On 03/09/2016 08:29 AM, Emilio López wrote:
>> One of the tests rely on a behaviour only observed on the driver currently
>> in use in Android. Disable it here until the behaviour is implemented
>> or it is decided it should not be implemented on the driver in mainline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez@...labora.co.uk>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>   tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> index c3e4c01..3f484318 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,14 @@ int main(void)
>>   	err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_one_timeline_merge);
>>   	err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_merge_same_fence);
>>   	err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_multi_timeline_wait);
>> +#if 0
>> +	/* The following test has been disabled due to differences
>> +	 * between the upstream and Android kernel drivers. The behaviour
>> +	 * that should occur when destroying a timeline with active fences
>> +	 * has not been defined yet.
>> +	 */
>>   	err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_wait_on_destroyed_timeline);
>> +#endif
>
> It would be useful to have a real define here that can be
> enabled later easily instead of if 0.

Ok, sounds good.

Thanks!
Emilio

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ