[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160328.114658.1782649417123902109.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sam@...nborg.org
Cc: zhaoxiu.zeng@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/31] Add sparc-specific parity functions
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:37:43 +0200
> If popc is availble then use of hweight* should be fine.
> But without popc then I think the generic implementation that
> uses the stanford algorithm would be most efficient,
> rather than the base this on the generic hweight functions.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists