[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1F3AC3675D538145B1661F571FE1805F2F2155BE@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:08:44 +0000
From: "Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hartmut Knaack" <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"Peter Meerwald" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] iio: accel: bmc150: remove unused definition
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:jic23@...nel.org]
> Sent: 28 March, 2016 13:09
> To: Tirdea, Irina; linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Hartmut Knaack; Lars-Peter Clausen; Peter Meerwald; Markus Pargmann
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iio: accel: bmc150: remove unused definition
>
> On 24/03/16 09:00, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> > bmc150_i2c_regmap_conf is defined in bmc150-accel-core.c, but
> > never used here. The definition is needed in bmc150-accel-i2c.c,
> > where it is again defined.
> >
> > Remove the unnecessary definition of bmc150_i2c_regmap_conf from
> > bmc150-accel-core.c and update the one from bmc150-accel-i2c.c
> > to contain all fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
> Silly question. Why isn't it shared between the i2c and spi drivers?
> Looks to be the same in both cases (as we'd expect from regmap most
> of the time!). I think it would be better to share it.
>
Good point. I'll keep the definition in the core file and share the regmap
with the rest.
Thanks,
Irina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists