[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160328174438.GB26086@dvhart-mobl5.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:44:38 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Michał Kępień wrote:
...
> > > First of all, this patch raises a couple of checkpatch warnings.
> >
> > The code on the whole reads well so I would be happy with it as is. Making
> > it (and the existing code) fully compliant with checkpatch results in harder
> > to read code - at least that was the consensus when it was initially merged,
> > which is why it was left in the current state. Darren may have an
> > alternative view on this though, in which case I'm happy to defer to his
> > preference.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. It's just something that crossed my mind.
>
> Darren, feel free to let me know if you would like to get this done.
I primarily care about Errors getting fixed, Warnings we take on a case by case
basis, but err on the side of legibility. In the case of a driver with an active
maintainer like Johnathan, I also weigh their input heavily. I haven't applied
it yet, so if I see something particularly concerning, I'll raise it at that
point.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists