[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160329225216.GB31869@yury-N73SV>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 01:52:16 +0300
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: arm64: kernel v4.6-rc1 hangs on QEMU
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:32:42AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 01:22:17 Yury Norov wrote:
> > >
> > > Undefined instruction in cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu() could be related
> > > to the SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1 access that was recently added.
> > >
> > > What does the architecture say about reading unknown cpuid registers?
> > >
> > > Arnd
> >
> > ThunderX has some unimplemented system registers. AFAIR, attempt to access it
> > causes data abort.
>
> Ok, if that is the case, maybe the read_cpuid() macro can be changed
> so it contains a fixup for the trap? That should handle both data abort
> and undefinstr.
>
> Arnd
Sounds alluring, but not clear what we'd return that way. I mean, how
we'd distinguish between correct value and error code (0, -1 or whatever).
But I think, we can do like this:
val = read_cpuid_safe(reg, impossible_val);
if (val == impossible_val)
goto err;
I think it will work for many cases.
Yury.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists