linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3a8lhkgfz.fsf@t19.piap.pl>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:21:04 +0200
From:	khalasa@...p.pl (Krzysztof Hałasa)
To:	Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Cc:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>,
	Richard Zhu <Richard.Zhu@...escale.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX6 PCIe: Fix imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() polarity

Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com> writes:

> ok - I'll respond there as I agree with the patch but not the wording
> of the commit (It's Gateworks 'Ventana' using IMX6 not Laguna and we
> do define the polarity properly as active-low in Ventana dt's).

Right, it's Ventana of course (I had been working with Laguna boards
recently).

> However, there seems to be another regression in 4.5 that's keeping
> PCI working for me and I'm still bisecting that (using 802.11n access
> points to test). Can you confirm that PCI works in v4.5 on IMX6 boards
> with only 5c5fb40de8f14391a1238db05cef88754faf9229 reverted?

I will check with my frame buffer and wifi cards.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland