[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FA8AEA.3000208@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:02:18 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] ARM: OMAP: Correct interrupt type for ARM TWD
Hi Tony,
On 18/03/16 15:41, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 03/17/2016 04:19 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The ARM TWD interrupt is a private peripheral interrupt (PPI) and per
>> the ARM GIC documentation, whether the type for PPIs can be set is
>> IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. For OMAP4 devices the PPI type cannot be set and
>> so when we attempt to set the type for the ARM TWD interrupt it fails.
>> This has done unnoticed because it fails silently and because we cannot
>> re-configure the type it has had no impact. Nevertheless fix the type
>> for the TWD interrupt so that it matches the hardware configuration.
>>
>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Tony, Grygorii,
>> Please note that I have not tested this. Can you test this series and
>> see if you see any warnings on OMAP4? I am guessing that the configuration
>> should be LEVEL and not EDGE. This was reported here:
>
> Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>
> Tested on PandaBoard. Without this patch I can see below warning:
I think that you can pick up this fix independently of this series as it
is something that has been broken for sometime and should be fixed. I
included it here for completeness to highlight the issue but if you want
to take it now, please go ahead.
Cheers
Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists