[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3656574.4DhkCSPNfU@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:30:29 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection
On Tuesday 29 March 2016 16:10:38 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
>
> So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device
> has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed
> through a new device called chipid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> [nicolas.ferre@...el.com: remove useless warnings]
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> [arnd@...db.de: suggest to use static functions to reduce scope]
>
(whole series)
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists