linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] cpufreq: exynos: Use generic platdev driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpomQ9=YK79o0fqHqZ7xexHv5EMJSPx+4KrT0RxeMh+hwWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:52:46 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Feng Xiao <xf@...k-chips.com>,
	Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] cpufreq: exynos: Use generic platdev driver

On 29 March 2016 at 20:34, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2016 12:09:49 Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> -static void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>> -{
>> -       struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>> -       const struct of_device_id *match;
>> -
>> -       match = of_match_node(exynos_cpufreq_matches, root);
>> -       if (!match) {
>> -               platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>> -               return;
>> -       }
>> -
>> -       platform_device_register_simple(match->data, -1, NULL, 0);
>> -}
>
> How is the "exynos-cpufreq" case handled now? Is that no longer used now?
> I assume the patch is correct based on Krzysztof's review, but it might be
> good to explain this better.

That's stale code, the driver got removed some time back.