| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1akwvL-0000qf-Ve@finisterre>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:55:23 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant" to the regulator tree
The patch
regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 6387990e059d2a30b2c668bfa7e06f8922cf7483 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:22:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant
The X-Powers AXP809 PMIC has a similar set of regulators as the AXP221,
though a few LDOs were removed, and a new switch output added. Like the
AXP221, AXP809 also has DC1SW and DC5LDO, which are internally chained
to DCDC1 and DCDC5, respectively.
Add support for this new variant. Also remove the "axp22x_" prefix from
DC1SW/DC5LDO supply handling code, as the AXP809 uses it as well.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
index 40cd894e4df5..6a601f377019 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
@@ -224,6 +224,61 @@ static const struct regulator_desc axp22x_regulators[] = {
AXP_DESC_FIXED(AXP22X, RTC_LDO, "rtc_ldo", "ips", 3000),
};
+static const struct regulator_linear_range axp809_dcdc4_ranges[] = {
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(600000, 0x0, 0x2f, 20000),
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1800000, 0x30, 0x38, 100000),
+};
+
+static const struct regulator_linear_range axp809_dldo1_ranges[] = {
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(700000, 0x0, 0x1a, 100000),
+ REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(3400000, 0x1b, 0x1f, 200000),
+};
+
+static const struct regulator_desc axp809_regulators[] = {
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DCDC1, "dcdc1", "vin1", 1600, 3400, 100,
+ AXP22X_DCDC1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(1)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DCDC2, "dcdc2", "vin2", 600, 1540, 20,
+ AXP22X_DCDC2_V_OUT, 0x3f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(2)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DCDC3, "dcdc3", "vin3", 600, 1860, 20,
+ AXP22X_DCDC3_V_OUT, 0x3f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(3)),
+ AXP_DESC_RANGES(AXP809, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", axp809_dcdc4_ranges,
+ 57, AXP22X_DCDC4_V_OUT, 0x3f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1,
+ BIT(4)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DCDC5, "dcdc5", "vin5", 1000, 2550, 50,
+ AXP22X_DCDC5_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(5)),
+ /* secondary switchable output of DCDC1 */
+ AXP_DESC_SW(AXP809, DC1SW, "dc1sw", NULL, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2,
+ BIT(7)),
+ /* LDO regulator internally chained to DCDC5 */
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DC5LDO, "dc5ldo", NULL, 700, 1400, 100,
+ AXP22X_DC5LDO_V_OUT, 0x7, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(0)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ALDO1, "aldo1", "aldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ALDO1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(6)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ALDO2, "aldo2", "aldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ALDO2_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL1, BIT(7)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ALDO3, "aldo3", "aldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ALDO3_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(5)),
+ AXP_DESC_RANGES(AXP809, DLDO1, "dldo1", "dldoin", axp809_dldo1_ranges,
+ 32, AXP22X_DLDO1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2,
+ BIT(3)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, DLDO2, "dldo2", "dldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_DLDO2_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(4)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ELDO1, "eldo1", "eldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ELDO1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(0)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ELDO2, "eldo2", "eldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ELDO2_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(1)),
+ AXP_DESC(AXP809, ELDO3, "eldo3", "eldoin", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_ELDO3_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(2)),
+ AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO0, "ldo_io0", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_LDO_IO0_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP20X_GPIO0_CTRL, 0x07,
+ AXP22X_IO_ENABLED, AXP22X_IO_DISABLED),
+ AXP_DESC_IO(AXP809, LDO_IO1, "ldo_io1", "ips", 700, 3300, 100,
+ AXP22X_LDO_IO1_V_OUT, 0x1f, AXP20X_GPIO1_CTRL, 0x07,
+ AXP22X_IO_ENABLED, AXP22X_IO_DISABLED),
+ AXP_DESC_FIXED(AXP809, RTC_LDO, "rtc_ldo", "ips", 1800),
+ AXP_DESC_SW(AXP809, SW, "sw", "swin", AXP22X_PWR_OUT_CTRL2, BIT(6)),
+};
+
static int axp20x_set_dcdc_freq(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 dcdcfreq)
{
struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
@@ -239,6 +294,7 @@ static int axp20x_set_dcdc_freq(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 dcdcfreq)
break;
case AXP221_ID:
case AXP223_ID:
+ case AXP809_ID:
min = 1800;
max = 4050;
def = 3000;
@@ -318,6 +374,7 @@ static int axp20x_set_dcdc_workmode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int id, u32 work
case AXP221_ID:
case AXP223_ID:
+ case AXP809_ID:
if (id < AXP22X_DCDC1 || id > AXP22X_DCDC5)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -346,8 +403,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
};
int ret, i, nregulators;
u32 workmode;
- const char *axp22x_dc1_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC1].name;
- const char *axp22x_dc5_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC5].name;
+ const char *dcdc1_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC1].name;
+ const char *dcdc5_name = axp22x_regulators[AXP22X_DCDC5].name;
switch (axp20x->variant) {
case AXP202_ID:
@@ -360,6 +417,10 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
regulators = axp22x_regulators;
nregulators = AXP22X_REG_ID_MAX;
break;
+ case AXP809_ID:
+ regulators = axp809_regulators;
+ nregulators = AXP809_REG_ID_MAX;
+ break;
default:
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported AXP variant: %ld\n",
axp20x->variant);
@@ -382,22 +443,22 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* part of this loop to see where we save the DT defined
* name.
*/
- if (regulators == axp22x_regulators) {
- if (i == AXP22X_DC1SW) {
- new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
- sizeof(*desc),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- *new_desc = regulators[i];
- new_desc->supply_name = axp22x_dc1_name;
- desc = new_desc;
- } else if (i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) {
- new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
- sizeof(*desc),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- *new_desc = regulators[i];
- new_desc->supply_name = axp22x_dc5_name;
- desc = new_desc;
- }
+ if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
+ (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
+ new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*desc),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ *new_desc = regulators[i];
+ new_desc->supply_name = dcdc1_name;
+ desc = new_desc;
+ }
+
+ if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC5LDO) ||
+ (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC5LDO)) {
+ new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*desc),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ *new_desc = regulators[i];
+ new_desc->supply_name = dcdc5_name;
+ desc = new_desc;
}
rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, desc, &config);
@@ -420,17 +481,17 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/*
* Save AXP22X DCDC1 / DCDC5 regulator names for later.
*/
- if (regulators == axp22x_regulators) {
- /* Can we use rdev->constraints->name instead? */
- if (i == AXP22X_DCDC1)
- of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
- "regulator-name",
- &axp22x_dc1_name);
- else if (i == AXP22X_DCDC5)
- of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
- "regulator-name",
- &axp22x_dc5_name);
- }
+ if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
+ (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
+ of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
+ "regulator-name",
+ &dcdc1_name);
+
+ if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC5) ||
+ (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC5))
+ of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
+ "regulator-name",
+ &dcdc5_name);
}
return 0;
--
2.8.0.rc3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists