[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160330065646.GA13123@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:56:46 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:54:37AM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 23:34 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Vishal,
> >
> > still NAK to calling the direct I/O code directly from the dax code.
>
> Hm, I thought this was what you meant -- do the fallback/retry attempts
> at the callers of dax_do_io instead of the new dax wrapper function..
> Did I misunderstand you?
Sorry, it is. I misread fs/block_dev.c as fs/dax.c before my first
coffee this morning. I'll properly review the series in the afternoon..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists