linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Update comment after a variable rename

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160329232446.GA22689@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:24:46 +0800
From:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Update comment after a variable rename

Suddenly realized there is another one not updated. Sorry.

---
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Update comment after a variable rename

Commit ed82b8a1ff76ed7b2709 renamed prio_to_weight to sched_prio_to_weight
and prio_to_wmult to sched_prio_to_wmult, but the old names not updated in
a comment.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 303d639..c5095b0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void __update_inv_weight(struct load_weight *lw)
  *   OR
  * (delta_exec * (weight * lw->inv_weight)) >> WMULT_SHIFT
  *
- * Either weight := NICE_0_LOAD and lw \e prio_to_wmult[], in which case
+ * Either weight := NICE_0_LOAD and lw \e sched_prio_to_wmult[], in which case
  * we're guaranteed shift stays positive because inv_weight is guaranteed to
  * fit 32 bits, and NICE_0_LOAD gives another 10 bits; therefore shift >= 22.
  *
@@ -5630,7 +5630,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp
  *   W_i,0 = \Sum_j w_i,j                                             (2)
  *
  * Where w_i,j is the weight of the j-th runnable task on cpu i. This weight
- * is derived from the nice value as per prio_to_weight[].
+ * is derived from the nice value as per sched_prio_to_weight[].
  *
  * The weight average is an exponential decay average of the instantaneous
  * weight:
-- 
1.7.9.5