[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FB8180.5040205@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:34:24 +0800
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<stefano.stabellini@...rix.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will.deacon@....com>, <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/17] arm/xen: Get event-channel irq through HVM_PARAM
when booting with ACPI
On 2016/3/30 0:35, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Shannon,
>
> On 24/03/16 14:44, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> When booting with ACPI, it could get the event-channel irq through
>
> The kernel will always get the event-channel IRQ through
> HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ.
>
> So I would say: ", the kernel will get the event-channel..."
>
>> HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> index d94f726..680aae0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>> #include <linux/time64.h>
>> #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>> #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>>
>> @@ -278,6 +279,35 @@ void __init xen_early_init(void)
>> add_preferred_console("hvc", 0, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> +static void __init xen_acpi_guest_init(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> + struct xen_hvm_param a;
>> + int interrupt, trigger, polarity;
>> +
>> + a.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>> + a.index = HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ;
>> + xen_events_irq = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &a)) {
>> + if ((a.value >> 56) == HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_TYPE_PPI) {
>> + interrupt = a.value & 0xff;
>> + trigger = ((a.value >> 8) & 0x1) ? ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE
>> + : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
>> + polarity = ((a.value >> 8) & 0x2) ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW
>> + : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
>> + xen_events_irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, interrupt,
>> + trigger, polarity);
>> + }
>> + }
>
> Can you invert the condition to remove one layer of indentation?
Sure, will update.
Thanks,
--
Shannon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists