[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FB89A8.90209@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:12 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: fix !cpuidle_ops[cpu].init case during
init
On 03/30/2016 09:16 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
[ ... ]
Added Lorenzo and Catalin.
>> Hi Jisheng,
>>
>> this should be handled in the arm_cpuidle_read_ops function.
>>
>
> Thanks for reviewing. After some consideration, I think this patch isn't correct
> There may be platforms which doesn't need the init member at all, although
> currently I don't see such platforms in mainline, So I'll drop this patch
> and send out one v2 only does the optimization.
There is an inconsistency between ARM and ARM64. The 'cpu_get_ops', the
arm_cpuidle_read_ops from the ARM64 side, returns -EOPNOTSUPP when the
init function is not there for cpuidle.
I don't think it is a problem, but as ARM/ARM64 are sharing the same
cpuidle-arm.c driver it would make sense to unify the behavior between
both archs.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists