linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] mm/slab: don't keep free slabs if free_objects exceeds free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:25:14 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] mm/slab: don't keep free slabs if free_objects
 exceeds free_limit

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:03:16PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, js1304@...il.com wrote:
> 
> > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> >
> > Currently, determination to free a slab is done whenever free object is
> > put into the slab. This has a problem that free slabs are not freed
> > even if we have free slabs and have more free_objects than free_limit
> 
> There needs to be a better explanation here since I do not get why there
> is an issue with checking after free if a slab is actually free.

Okay. Consider following 3 objects free situation.

free_limt = 10
nr_free = 9

free(free slab) free(free slab) free(not free slab)

If we check it one by one, when nr_free > free_limit (at last free),
we cannot free the slab because current slab isn't a free slab.

But, if we check it lastly, we can free 1 free slab.

I will add more explanation on the next version.

> 
> > when processed slab isn't a free slab. This would cause to keep
> > too much memory in the slab subsystem. This patch try to fix it
> > by checking number of free object after all free work is done. If there
> > is free slab at that time, we can free it so we keep free slab as minimal
> > as possible.
> 
> Ok if we check after free work is done then the number of free slabs may
> be higher than the limit set and then we free the additional slabs to get
> down to the limit that was set?

Yes.

Thanks.