linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/vfs: improve __mnt_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160330012310.GA3497@yaowei-K42JY>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:23:10 +0800
From:	Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/vfs: improve __mnt_is_readonly

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:43:21AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Yaowei Bai
> <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:43:32AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:01:26AM +0800, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> >> > This patch refactors __mnt_is_readonly and makes it return bool to
> >> > improve readability due to this particular function only using either
> >> > one or zero as its return value.
> >>
> >> Improve in which way, if I may ask?
> >
> > A boolean return value can be more matchable with function's name and
> > more suitable as this function only returns 0/1.
> 
> Please also think of the arguments made on linux-mtd[1].
> Hopping from one subsystem to another trying to sneak patches
> in is not the best idea... :-)

Acturally, this patch was sent before the mtd ones and all of them were sent
in one shot. You're really thinking too much.:-)

> 
> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2016-March/066296.html
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> //richard