[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160330112837.GG2510@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:28:37 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] x86/cpufeature: Kill cpu_has_pat
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 05:42:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> ---
>
> @tip guys, the pat_bsp_init() and pat_ap_init() hunk will conflict with
>
> d63dcf49cf5a ("x86/mm/pat: Replace cpu_has_pat with boot_cpu_has()")
>
> in tip/x86:mm. Let me know how you wanna handle it. Or you can simply
> delete those hunks below when applying after merging the above branch.
> Or I can send this patch later... Yadda yadda.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 5e02bc2e8444..ad480c5fb27c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32];
> #define cpu_has_aes boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AES)
> #define cpu_has_avx boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX)
> #define cpu_has_avx2 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX2)
> -#define cpu_has_pat boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)
> #define cpu_has_xsave boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)
> #define cpu_has_xsaves boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> index faec01e7a17d..6df20ac83ec3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void pat_bsp_init(u64 pat)
> {
> u64 tmp_pat;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_pat) {
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) {
> pat_disable("PAT not supported by CPU.");
> return;
> }
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void pat_ap_init(u64 pat)
> if (!pat_enabled())
> return;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_pat) {
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)) {
> /*
> * If this happens we are on a secondary CPU, but switched to
> * PAT on the boot CPU. We have no way to undo PAT.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 3d31d3ac589e..aaec8aef9fd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> if (args->flags & ~(I915_MMAP_WC))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (args->flags & I915_MMAP_WC && !cpu_has_pat)
> + if (args->flags & I915_MMAP_WC && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, args->handle);
> --
> 2.7.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists