linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcRkwDm60b7PTJmYmPVX7iNoLFL_pcx5qUK8=E7zMyKtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:41:29 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	qiujiang <qiujiang@...wei.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxarm@...wei.com, haifeng.wei@...wei.com,
	charles.chenxin@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:31 AM, qiujiang <qiujiang@...wei.com> wrote:
> This patch adds gpio-signaled acpi event support. It is used for
> power button on hisilicon D02 board, an arm64 platform.

Yes, looks good, my tag stays.

> @@ -502,10 +509,17 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
>                         }
>                 }
>
> +               if (has_acpi_companion(dev) && pp->idx == 0)
> +                       pp->irq = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(dev), 0);
> +

>                 pp->irq_shared  = false;
>                 pp->gpio_base   = -1;


> +
>                 if (dev->of_node)
>                         pp->name = to_of_node(fwnode)->full_name;

This change doesn't belong the patch, though it should gone with the
two lines of pp->name assignment as per Alan's suggestion to get rid
of pp->name completely.

> +
> +               if (has_acpi_companion(dev))
> +                       pp->name = acpi_dev_name(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko