[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160330131521.GE3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:15:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <alfredoalvarezfernandez@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> dependency chain hlocks: 49608 [max: 327680]
OK, so that is still below the u16 limit, so you're seeing an actual
hash collision and my patch will not cure that.
A different hash function _might_ help, but eventually this is an
unfixable problem. Our input space is (2^13)^48 = 2^(13*48) = 2^624 =
ff'n huge, reducing that to 2^64 is bound to generate a collision at some
point.
[ technically the 48 held_lock spots are not fully independent, so
(2^13)^48 is slightly overestimating it, but the numbers are big
enough for this to not matter much. ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists