[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160330141242.GC3420@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:12:42 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf report: Show message for percent limit on stdio
Em Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:13:17PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> When the hierarchy mode is used, some entries might be omiited due to a
> percent limit or filter. In this case the output hierarchy is different
> than other entries. Add an informative message to users about this.
>
> For example, when 4% of percent limit is applied:
Hi Namhyung, while replying to a message about parent sorting being
broken I noticed that the code to show a message about --percent-limit
seems to be only present on --hierachy mode, could you please consider
adding it to the non-hierarchy case?
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
>
> After:
>
> # Overhead Command / Shared Object / Symbol
> # .............. ..........................................
> #
> 49.09% swapper
> 48.67% [kernel.vmlinux]
> 34.42% [k] intel_idle
> 11.51% firefox
> 8.87% libpthread-2.22.so
> 6.60% [.] __GI___libc_recvmsg
> 10.49% gnome-shell
> 4.74% libc-2.22.so
> no entry >= 4.00%
> 10.08% Xorg
> 6.11% libc-2.22.so
> 5.27% [.] __memcpy_sse2_unaligned
> 6.15% perf
> no entry >= 4.00%
>
> Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> index 435eaaaf2f1d..b3bdfcb245f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ size_t hists__fprintf(struct hists *hists, bool show_header, int max_rows,
> bool first = true;
> size_t linesz;
> char *line = NULL;
> + unsigned indent;
>
> init_rem_hits();
>
> @@ -704,6 +705,8 @@ print_entries:
> goto out;
> }
>
> + indent = hists__overhead_width(hists) + 4;
> +
> for (nd = rb_first(&hists->entries); nd; nd = __rb_hierarchy_next(nd, HMD_FORCE_CHILD)) {
> struct hist_entry *h = rb_entry(nd, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
> float percent;
> @@ -720,6 +723,20 @@ print_entries:
> if (max_rows && ++nr_rows >= max_rows)
> break;
>
> + /*
> + * If all children are filtered out or percent-limited,
> + * display "no entry >= x.xx%" message.
> + */
> + if (!h->leaf && !hist_entry__has_hierarchy_children(h, min_pcnt)) {
> + int nr_sort = hists->hpp_list->nr_sort_keys;
> +
> + print_hierarchy_indent(sep, nr_sort + h->depth + 1, spaces, fp);
> + fprintf(fp, "%*sno entry >= %.2f%%\n", indent, "", min_pcnt);
> +
> + if (max_rows && ++nr_rows >= max_rows)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (h->ms.map == NULL && verbose > 1) {
> __map_groups__fprintf_maps(h->thread->mg,
> MAP__FUNCTION, fp);
> --
> 2.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists