linux-kernel - [PATCH 42/43] staging/lustre/ldlm: revert changes to ldlm_cancel_aged

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1459356495-2794775-43-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:48:14 -0400
From:	green@...uxhacker.ru
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>,
	Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 42/43] staging/lustre/ldlm: revert changes to ldlm_cancel_aged_policy()

From: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>

The changes to ldlm_cancel_aged_policy() introduced from LU-4300
was incorrect. This patch revert this part of changes.

Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@...el.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/12448
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5727
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index 2f12194..48e9828 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1240,10 +1240,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_aged_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 						 int unused, int added,
 						 int count)
 {
-	if (added >= count)
-		return LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK;
-
-	if (time_before(cfs_time_current(),
+	if ((added >= count) &&
+	    time_before(cfs_time_current(),
 			cfs_time_add(lock->l_last_used, ns->ns_max_age)))
 		return LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK;
 
-- 
2.1.0