linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 Resend 2/3] cpufreq: dt: Add generic platform-device creation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160330032240.GB8773@vireshk-i7>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:52:40 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, heiko@...ech.de, xf@...k-chips.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mmcclint@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 Resend 2/3] cpufreq: dt: Add generic platform-device
 creation support

On 29-03-16, 21:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Regarding new platforms, I'd hope that we could manage to define an extension
> to the oppv2 binding that marks a machine as compatible with opp, so we can

The extension of oppv2 binding or compatible string is for platforms that really
need extend oppv2 (like ST, which already have a new compatible string). I am
not sure if we should be putting that into the Machine's compatible area, as I
though it is something internal to OPP layer or their driver.

But we can see that when we handle it.

-- 
viresh