[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuJhrfE_6s2y9Cdo8t3Z3mvKf9rYs-kkRfBFD_SNL7pv=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:33:24 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Jun Li <jun.li@....com>, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"r.baldyga@...sung.com" <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the
usb gadget power negotation
On 30 March 2016 at 19:24, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Seems you don't want to guarantee charger type detection is done
>>> >> >> > before gadget connection(pullup DP), right?
>>> >> >> > I see you call usb_charger_detect_type() in each gadget usb
>>> >> >> > state
>>> >> >> changes.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I am not sure I get your point correctly, please correct me if I
>>> >> >> misunderstand you.
>>> >> >> We need to check the charger type at every event comes from the
>>> >> >> usb gadget state changes or the extcon device state changes, which
>>> >> >> means a new charger plugin or pullup.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > According to usb charger spec, my understanding is you can't do
>>> >> > real charger detection procedure *after* gadget _connection_(pullup
>>> >> > DP), also I don't
>>> >>
>>> >> Why can not? Charger detection is usually from PMIC.
>>> >
>>> > Charger detection process will impact DP/DM line state, see usb
>>> > charger spec v1.2 for detail detection process, section 4.6.3 says:
>>> >
>>> > "A PD is allowed to *disconnect* and repeat the charger detection
>>> > process multiple times while attached. The PD is required to wait for
>>> > a time of at least TCP_VDM_EN max between disconnecting and restarting
>>> > the charger detection process."
>>> >
>>> > As Peter mentioned, the charger detection should happen between VBUS
>>> > detection and gadget pull up DP for first plug in case. So when&after
>>> > gadget connect (pullup DP), you should already know the charger type.
>>>
>>> Make sense. In our company's solution, charger detection can be done by
>>> hardware from PMIC at first, then it will not affect the DP/DM line when
>>> gadget starts to enumeration.
>>
>> I see, charger type detection is done automatically by PMIC when VBUS
>> is detected in your case, you just assume the process is complete
>
> assuming this finishes before gadget starts is a bad idea. It would've
> been much more robust to delay usb_gadget_connect() until we KNOW
> charger detection has completed.
It is hardware action to detect the charger type quickly. It actually
*gets* the charger type and does not means *detect* charger type in
'usb_charger_detect_type()' function. Maybe I need to change the
function name as 'usb_charger_get_type()'.
If some udc drivers want to detect charger type in
'gadget->ops->get_charger_type()' callback, they should avoid
impacting DP/DM line state at the right gadget state. Thanks.
>
> --
> balbi
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists