[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459405903.14336.64.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:31:43 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/6] rt/locking: Reenable migration accross schedule
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 11:44 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I really wonder what makes the change. The only thing which comes to my mind
> is the enforcement of running the online and down_prepare callbacks on the
> plugged cpu instead of doing it wherever the scheduler decides to run it.
It seems it's not the state machinery making a difference after all,
the only two deadlocks encountered in oodles of beating seem to boil
down to the grab_lock business being a pistol aimed at our own toes.
1. kernfs_mutex taken during hotplug: We don't pin across mutex
acquisition, so anyone grabbing it and then calling migrate_disable()
while grab_lock is set renders us dead. Pin across acquisition of that
specific mutex fixes that specific grab_lock instigated deadlock.
2. notifier dependency upon RCU GP threads: Telling same to always do
migrate_me() or hotplug can bloody well wait fixes that specific
grab_lock instigated deadlock.
With those two little hacks, all of my boxen including DL980 just keep
on chugging away in 4.[456]-rt, showing zero inclination to identify
any more hotplug bandits.
What I like much better than 1 + 2 is their sum, which would generate
minus signs, my favorite thing in patches, and fix the two above and
anything that resembles them in any way...
3. nuke irksome grab_lock: make everybody always try to get the hell
outta Dodge or hotplug can bloody well wait.
I haven't yet flogged my 64 core box doing that, but my local boxen
seem to be saying we don't really really need the grab_lock business.
Are my boxen fibbing, is that very attractive looking door #3 a trap?
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists