lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160331103154.22e1687e@bbrezillon>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:31:54 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: Adding the nand/next branch to linux-next

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:24:32 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:15:38 +0200 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> >
> > I recently became maintainer of the NAND flash subsystem, and, if you
> > don't mind, I'd like to add my nand/next branch [1] to linux-next.
> > 
> > [1]git://github.com/linux-nand/linux.git nand/next
> 
> Added from today.

Thanks.

> 
> Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
> you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
> linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
> conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 
> 
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
>      * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
>         Signed-off-by,
>      * posted to the relevant mailing list,
>      * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
>      * successfully unit tested, and 
>      * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
> 
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
> 



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ