[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56FCE556.80306@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:52:38 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC: <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<gleb@...nel.org>, <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wei@...hat.com>, <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable
AVIC
Hi Radim,
On 03/19/2016 04:44 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-03-18 01:09-0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
>> +
>> + WRITE_ONCE(*entry, new_entry);
>
> This will translate to two writes in 32 bit mode and we need to write
> physical ID first to avoid spurious doorbells ...
> is the order guaranteed?
Hm.. not sure on that.
>> + } else {
>> + new_entry = READ_ONCE(*entry);
>> + /**
>> + * This handles the case when vcpu is scheduled out
>> + * and has not yet not called blocking. We save the
>> + * AVIC running flag so that we can restore later.
>> + */
>
> is_running must be disabled in between ...blocking and ...unblocking,
> because we don't want to miss interrupts and block forever.
> I somehow don't get it from the comment. :)
Not sure if I understand your concern. However, the is_running bit
setting/clearing should be handled in the avic_set_running below. This
part only handles othe case when the is_running bit still set when
calling vcpu_put (and later on loading some other vcpus). This way, when
we are re-loading this vcpu, we can restore the is_running bit accordingly.
Thanks,
Suravee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists