lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160331085858.GA22350@e104805>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:58:58 +0100
From:	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
To:	"Champ, Andy" <andycham@...zon.co.uk>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
	"durgadoss.r@...el.com" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>,
	"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
	"kapileshwar.singh@....com" <kapileshwar.singh@....com>,
	"wni@...dia.com" <wni@...dia.com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Syntactic and factual errors in the API document

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:32:26AM +0000, Champ, Andy wrote:
> I thought that _was_ the current kernel (not the obsolete one our chip vendor supports).
> 
> Which one do you mean by current? (URL & commit ID would be great!)

You can find it in the MAINTAINERS file.  I think Jon refers to 

git://git.lwn.net/linux.git docs-next

Cheers,
Javi

> ________________________________________
> From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Sent: 31 March 2016 07:43
> To: Champ, Andy
> Cc: edubezval@...il.com; javi.merino@....com; durgadoss.r@...el.com; leo.yan@...aro.org; kapileshwar.singh@....com; wni@...dia.com; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Syntactic and factual errors in the API document
> 
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:37:25 +0000
> Andy Champ <andycham@...zon.com> wrote:
> 
> > There are several places where the English in the document is syntactically
> > invalid, or unclear. There are also one or two factual errors.
> 
> I went to apply this one to the docs tree, but it no longer applies to
> current kernels.  Any chance of getting a respin?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ