| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-47252cfbac03644ee4a3adfa50c77896aa94f2bb@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 02:28:50 -0700
From: tip-bot for Steven Rostedt <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, efault@....de,
hpa@...or.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add preempt checks in
preempt_schedule() code
Commit-ID: 47252cfbac03644ee4a3adfa50c77896aa94f2bb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/47252cfbac03644ee4a3adfa50c77896aa94f2bb
Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:23:39 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:49:45 +0200
sched/core: Add preempt checks in preempt_schedule() code
While testing the tracer preemptoff, I hit this strange trace:
<...>-259 0...1 0us : schedule <-worker_thread
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_note_context_switch <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_sched_qs <-rcu_note_context_switch
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_preempt_qs <-rcu_note_context_switch
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : _raw_spin_lock <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : preempt_count_add <-_raw_spin_lock
<...>-259 0d..2 0us : do_raw_spin_lock <-_raw_spin_lock
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : deactivate_task <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_rq_clock.part.84 <-deactivate_task
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : dequeue_task_fair <-deactivate_task
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : dequeue_entity <-dequeue_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_curr <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_min_vruntime <-update_curr
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : cpuacct_charge <-update_curr
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : __rcu_read_lock <-cpuacct_charge
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : __rcu_read_unlock <-cpuacct_charge
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : clear_buddies <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : account_entity_dequeue <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : update_min_vruntime <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : update_cfs_shares <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : hrtick_update <-dequeue_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : wq_worker_sleeping <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : kthread_data <-wq_worker_sleeping
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_task_fair <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : check_cfs_rq_runtime <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : clear_buddies <-pick_next_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : clear_buddies <-pick_next_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : set_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : put_prev_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : check_cfs_rq_runtime <-put_prev_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : set_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : finish_task_switch <-__schedule
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : _raw_spin_unlock_irq <-finish_task_switch
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : do_raw_spin_unlock <-_raw_spin_unlock_irq
gnome-sh-1031 0...2 3us!: preempt_count_sub <-_raw_spin_unlock_irq
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 582us : do_raw_spin_lock <-_raw_spin_lock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : _raw_spin_unlock <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : do_raw_spin_unlock <-_raw_spin_unlock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : preempt_count_sub <-_raw_spin_unlock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 584us : _raw_spin_unlock <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 584us+: trace_preempt_on <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 603us : <stack trace>
=> preempt_count_sub
=> _raw_spin_unlock
=> drm_gem_object_lookup
=> i915_gem_madvise_ioctl
=> drm_ioctl
=> do_vfs_ioctl
=> SyS_ioctl
=> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
As I'm tracing preemption disabled, it seemed incorrect that the trace
would go across a schedule and report not being in the scheduler.
Looking into this I discovered the problem.
schedule() calls preempt_disable() but the preempt_schedule() calls
preempt_enable_notrace(). What happened above was that the gnome-shell
task was preempted on another CPU, migrated over to the idle cpu. The
tracer stared with idle calling schedule(), which called
preempt_disable(), but then gnome-shell finished, and it enabled
preemption with preempt_enable_notrace() that does stop the trace, even
though preemption was enabled.
The purpose of the preempt_disable_notrace() in the preempt_schedule()
is to prevent function tracing from going into an infinite loop.
Because function tracing can trace the preempt_enable/disable() calls
that are traced. The problem with function tracing is:
NEED_RESCHED set
preempt_schedule()
preempt_disable()
preempt_count_inc()
function trace (before incrementing preempt count)
preempt_disable_notrace()
preempt_enable_notrace()
sees NEED_RESCHED set
preempt_schedule() (repeat)
Now by breaking out the preempt off/on tracing into their own code:
preempt_disable_check() and preempt_enable_check(), we can add these to
the preempt_schedule() code. As preemption would then be disabled, even
if they were to be traced by the function tracer, the disabled
preemption would prevent the recursion.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160321112339.6dc78ad6@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 8b489fc..b5cf01d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2958,6 +2958,20 @@ u64 scheduler_tick_max_deferment(void)
#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) && (defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT) || \
defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER))
+/*
+ * If the value passed in is equal to the current preempt count
+ * then we just disabled preemption. Start timing the latency.
+ */
+static inline void preempt_latency_start(int val)
+{
+ if (preempt_count() == val) {
+ unsigned long ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+ current->preempt_disable_ip = ip;
+#endif
+ trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, ip);
+ }
+}
void preempt_count_add(int val)
{
@@ -2976,17 +2990,21 @@ void preempt_count_add(int val)
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON((preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK) >=
PREEMPT_MASK - 10);
#endif
- if (preempt_count() == val) {
- unsigned long ip = get_lock_parent_ip();
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
- current->preempt_disable_ip = ip;
-#endif
- trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, ip);
- }
+ preempt_latency_start(val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(preempt_count_add);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(preempt_count_add);
+/*
+ * If the value passed in equals to the current preempt count
+ * then we just enabled preemption. Stop timing the latency.
+ */
+static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val)
+{
+ if (preempt_count() == val)
+ trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
+}
+
void preempt_count_sub(int val)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
@@ -3003,13 +3021,15 @@ void preempt_count_sub(int val)
return;
#endif
- if (preempt_count() == val)
- trace_preempt_on(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
+ preempt_latency_stop(val);
__preempt_count_sub(val);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(preempt_count_sub);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(preempt_count_sub);
+#else
+static inline void preempt_latency_start(int val) { }
+static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
#endif
/*
@@ -3284,8 +3304,23 @@ void __sched schedule_preempt_disabled(void)
static void __sched notrace preempt_schedule_common(void)
{
do {
+ /*
+ * Because the function tracer can trace preempt_count_sub()
+ * and it also uses preempt_enable/disable_notrace(), if
+ * NEED_RESCHED is set, the preempt_enable_notrace() called
+ * by the function tracer will call this function again and
+ * cause infinite recursion.
+ *
+ * Preemption must be disabled here before the function
+ * tracer can trace. Break up preempt_disable() into two
+ * calls. One to disable preemption without fear of being
+ * traced. The other to still record the preemption latency,
+ * which can also be traced by the function tracer.
+ */
preempt_disable_notrace();
+ preempt_latency_start(1);
__schedule(true);
+ preempt_latency_stop(1);
preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
/*
@@ -3337,7 +3372,21 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched notrace preempt_schedule_notrace(void)
return;
do {
+ /*
+ * Because the function tracer can trace preempt_count_sub()
+ * and it also uses preempt_enable/disable_notrace(), if
+ * NEED_RESCHED is set, the preempt_enable_notrace() called
+ * by the function tracer will call this function again and
+ * cause infinite recursion.
+ *
+ * Preemption must be disabled here before the function
+ * tracer can trace. Break up preempt_disable() into two
+ * calls. One to disable preemption without fear of being
+ * traced. The other to still record the preemption latency,
+ * which can also be traced by the function tracer.
+ */
preempt_disable_notrace();
+ preempt_latency_start(1);
/*
* Needs preempt disabled in case user_exit() is traced
* and the tracer calls preempt_enable_notrace() causing
@@ -3347,6 +3396,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched notrace preempt_schedule_notrace(void)
__schedule(true);
exception_exit(prev_ctx);
+ preempt_latency_stop(1);
preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
} while (need_resched());
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists