linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpio / ACPI: ignore GpioInt() GPIOs when requesting GPIO_OUT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:49:13 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio / ACPI: ignore GpioInt() GPIOs when requesting GPIO_OUT_*

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
>
> When firmware does not use _DSD properties that allow properly name GPIO
> resources, the kernel falls back on parsing _CRS resources, and will
> return entries described as GpioInt() as general purpose GPIOs even
> though they are meant to be used simply as interrupt sources for the
> device:

Patch applied for fixes. Is this a regression so that I should
also tag it for stable?

Yours,
Linus Walleij